Dear Sandra: Activate This...

I didn't even have to read the entire article to know what she was
going to say, but CNN.com reported today that ex-supreme Sandra Day O'Connor was a trifle upset at the label "activist judge" being applied to our judiciary (supreme or otherwise). So sorry, Sandy.

But, Sandra, it's not really your fault. It's ours. We Americans
are lazy. Let's face it. We harp about Al Gore's living, breathing,
copulating constitution. Rightly so. But Al's only half wrong. The
constitution does have a way to live on beyond the era of our
founders. It's called the amendment process. Problem is we're too
worried about Monday Night Football to deal with a lengthy
constitutional debate. Let's just turn it over to the judiciary.
We're getting what we deserve.

So remember, friends, when they come for you and yours I sure hope
you enjoyed the game.

- R.L.

Airport Starbucks = Terrorist Hot Spots

My headline may be attention getting, but it is hardly far from the truth.  At least according to Bruce Sterling's recent article in this month's Wired Magazine: Barbarians at Gate 8.  I don't often agree with Mr. Sterling's politics, but his writing is always enjoyable and thought provoking.  While that great promoter of anti-Babel, the Internet, seems to be a Westernizing influence at first glance, it is much more akin to the amoral flame.  The same fire that heats your home from the fireplace, can burn it down if not contained.

When it comes to terrorism, the Internet is not too far removed from the telephone.  Both allow for free and open communication.  Both can be monitored (more or less) by law enforcement (one more easily and more often than the other, perhaps).  Both technologies are in and of themselves amoral.  Both have certainly been used in the commission of petty misdemeanors and felonious atrocities.  Both have become too important to commerce to be removed from society without a much-improved replacement.

As far as travel is concerned, while it is certainly easier today than ever there are still significant hurdles to the cultural migrations Sterling mentions--short of using the U.S.-Mexican border.  Travel is expensive, but necessary for terrorism to succeed.  Travel is less necessary for commerce (I'm talking about the movement of human beings, and excluding the shipping of merchandise).

I don't have any great insight in how to resolve this particular issue (both freedom and liberty can be used against themselves--see Rousseau), but I think this article is worth some pondering.

- R.L.